The most consequential failures in mergers and acquisitions rarely occur in the boardroom. They emerge months after closing when undiscovered contractual defects, regulatory gaps, or unresolved disputes surface. As the United Arab Emirates (“UAE”) consolidates its position as a premier destination for mergers and acquisition (“M&A”) transactions, the distinction between a seamless transaction and a protracted dispute increasingly hinges on the quality and depth of legal due diligence conducted before commitment.
With M&A deal values in the Gulf Co-operation Council region projected to grow substantially in 2026, institutional and family-backed acquirers across the region have demonstrably shifted their approach. Where financial metrics once dominated purchase decisions, legal and compliance certainty now operates as a parallel and often determinative pillar of valuation and deal structure.
Legal due diligence addresses a straightforward but critical challenge: commercial value is substantially diminished if the target company harbors unreported contractual disputes, regulatory non-compliance, unresolved litigation, or defective ownership structures. Buyers increasingly recognize that attractive financial returns carry negligible meaning when encumbered by post-acquisition legal liabilities.
A comprehensive legal due diligence investigation answers the substantive questions upon which deal certainty rests:
Ambiguities here can result in loss of key revenue streams or forced renegotiation at unfavorable terms.
Any discrepancies prevent the buyer from exercising proper control and expose them to regulatory penalties.
This is particularly acute in regulated sectors such as finance, healthcare and education, where specific regulatory requirements apply.
These become the buyer's responsibility upon closing and can materially erode realized value.
Modern M&A transactions involve layered obligations across regulators, commercial partners, financing stakeholders, and employees. Hence, legal due diligence functions as the structural foundation upon which valuation models and deal mechanics are anchored.
Shareholder disputes, undisclosed litigation, expired or non-transferable licenses, and employment contract defects rank among the most common causes.
This experience has concentrated buyer focus on several critical areas:
The practical effect is that legal due diligence has moved from a compliance formality to an integral component of deal valuation and risk allocation. Buyers now explicitly tie purchase price adjustments, indemnification structures, and earn out mechanics to due diligence findings, recognizing that unidentified legal risks may ultimately reduce realized value.
Post-acquisition disputes and operational complications are frequently traceable to inadequate or rushed legal due diligence. The risk is particularly acute in regulated sectors. Fintech, healthcare, education, trading, and real estate face regulatory authorities that have materially tightened compliance standards in the recent past. A single overlooked sectoral obligation can constrain operations, trigger enforcement action, or result in operational suspension pending remediation.
Thorough legal due diligence provides the following tangible benefits:
Conducting legal due diligence on UAE targets includes investigating the following:
These expectations show that buyers demand full legal compliance from sellers to get the best deal terms, as incomplete due diligence often leads to future disputes and lost value.
| Category | Common Issues | Deal Impact |
| Corporate Governance |
- Outdated UBO filings; - Missing approvals |
- Deal delays; - Penalties |
| Contracts |
- Unfavourable change-of-control clauses; - Expired terms |
- Renegotiations; - Terminations |
| Litigation |
- Pending legal cases/ disputes; - Unquantified risks |
- Higher liabilities |
| Employment |
- Non-compliant contracts; - End-of-service gaps |
- Payroll fixes; - Employee disruptions |
| Regulatory |
- Expired licenses; - Non-compliance |
- Operational halts |
The defects typically reflect operational gaps or inconsistent compliance practices within the target business. However, irrespective of intent, they create material post-acquisition risk that prudent buyers allocate during transaction structuring.
MBG Corporate Services advises and guides our customers through every stage of the M&A transaction lifecycle, from initial due diligence to successful closing of the deal, with expertise in legal due diligence, contract review and drafting, and regulatory compliance assessment.
Whether you are an acquirer seeking to purchase with confidence or a seller positioning your business for optimal valuation, our due diligence practice provides the clarity required for efficient, well-informed transactions. We bring experience across diverse sectors ensuring that our analysis reflects both general corporate law principles and industry-specific regulatory nuances.
Legal due diligence has always been essential to M&A transactions. What has changed is that UAE regulatory frameworks are increasingly granular and sophisticated, and buyers have learned from past disruptions that regulatory and contractual ambiguity is extraordinarily costly to resolve post-closing. By investing in thorough due diligence before commitment, buyers avoid substantially greater costs and delays after acquiring the business.
Legal issues identified during due diligence typically result in one of three outcomes: (1) price reduction to reflect residual risk; (2) indemnification arrangements under which the seller retains liability for specific issues; or (3) transaction restructuring to address identified defects before closing. In many cases, competent legal due diligence actually allows buyers to acquire at more favorable valuations because risks are transparently quantified.
Yes, the transaction can proceed. Once issues are identified, the buyer and seller can address them through revised purchase terms, warranties, indemnifications, escrow arrangements, or contractual remedies.